Just a suggestion.Adobe Photoshop is a complete image-editing solution and the professional standard in digital imaging, with an endless selection of drawing tools, filters, and color-adjustment capabilities for manipulating items in almost any way. Granted, Not everyone would prefer the old versions of the software. The words design and photo editing go with Photoshop on almost every lip. I don't see anyone else towering higher than Adobe in the next couple of years. Adobe is a giant in the design and creative tools category. But for guys with money that goes thousands for a dollar, they could be given old Adobe products just to help them get things going. Personally, I prefer the new upgrades since they are way better compared to the old ones. But I can suggest, Adobe could give away some of its old products for free like Creative Suite CS5.
I don't really see lowering the prices of its products as a better way for both the company and users of its products. Adobe is big and by that I mean it must have a lot of people in its staff. However, I would suggest to Adobe to think of ways to to business especially with countries that have money with low exchange power. Although, $10 might mean different things to people in different countries, I still hold it up as a better pricing model. The current pricing model is better in my opinion. How many people - in either developed or developing countries - actually have 5 PC's FRS? It may not be 5 PC's but its not terrible. Plus there are the apps that you can download and use from your phone/tablet.
Programs like GIMP 2.0 can be a reasonable alternative for those who don't want to pay.Īlso for what its worth with the whole Adobe/Microsoft thing - Don't forget that you can have all the Creative Cloud apps (depending on your licence) on two computers. otherwise I wouldn't participate here as much as I have been. Whilst I agree with dassd32255842 I unfortunately don't think this is very easy to enforce in any way without either creating lots of red tape or further availability for exploit.īut that's neither here nor there in the grand scheme of things.
but this depends on your definition anyway. I'm not going to say that they're aren't any "good guys". The whole world is one large pot of various shades of grey. Microsoft? I thought everybody hated them? They're the good guys now? Noted.
0 kommentar(er)
